BLAST template confusion
-
MF
I agree - that is somewhat confusing... need to think about that one..
I would typically organize such jobs in leaf nodes:
./10.download.from.ncbi ./20.create.blastdb ./30.blast
but your approach is no less valid ...
-
MF
Think I have a solution - make only those vars inheritable that are either defined as being inheritable or NOT in the template definition.
Thus: 'db' would be in the template definition of blastdb and is not inherited by jobs in subdirs. Any dummy var would be inherited.
-
MF
- State changed from new to invalid
fixing this is weird - it makes thinks more complicated than need be -
I suggest that in templates we'll try to use better names for parameters -
and, possibly, that one should not organise a pipeline in such a way that there are many jobs in leaf directories of other jobs. ALthough this is a matter of taste.
It will be improved partly by solving ticket [19] - as that will make sure that it is clear if a parameter is inherited.
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.